google92233554f2d24822.html
top of page

Five Topics for Management

Seeking Financing by Laura Emerson Entrepreneurs are, by nature, visionary and optimistic. Perhaps as a result, many may be wooed by pie-in-the sky investment discussions that never result in bona fide term sheets. (There are a lot of time wasters out there). They may discourage realistic but less flattering offers, which might be more realistic. For these reasons, I recommend that the entrepreneurial management teams discuss the following five tough questions amongst themselves and update a file of written answers for their eyes only as the company fortunes wax or wane. You will note that they approach the same go/no go question from different perspectives. Question 1: If your company has no other clients or revenue sources other than those currently active, how long can it sustain its burn-rate? Question 2: How time sensitive is your financial need? Question 3: Under what investment terms are you willing to sell 51% of the company, step aside from a management role, or give up a Board seat? Question 4: What upcoming milestones will make the company cash flow positive? How much time and money are required to meet the minimums? Question 5: If all goes well and the company grows, at what point will expansion exceed the competency of current management? This “reality check” will help your team ask discerning questions of potential investors early and to assess and negotiate offering terms at various points in the company’s future. INTERNAL DISCUSSION: Question 1: If your company has no other clients or revenue sources other than those currently active, how long can it sustain its burn-rate? Analysis: Entrepreneurs may project fantastic valuations after aspirational milestones, but investors and other financial sources also evaluate the present, so entrepreneurs should, too. The more immediate a company’s need for money, frankly, the less sense it makes to spend time and effort seeking private equity and the more sense it makes for the company to spend time hawking its widgets to paying customers, increasing its profit margin, and cutting costs. Due diligence by investors will ALWAYS take longer than a financially strapped company wants, and its financial vulnerability will be obvious to the investor, who will either regard that deal as risky enough to (a) abandon or (b) offer less than the entrepreneur needs or (c) propose onerous terms, essentially banking on the entrepreneur failing. To Do: Figure out how long the company can remain in business with no investment and nothing other than organic growth. Calculate the cost of the number of months required to turn a profit and repay debt. This is the amount of money the company needs (vs. wants). How much of the company would you sell to an equity investor or how much interest would pay on a loan that carried you through this time period? Is it a make or break decision? Question 2: How time sensitive is your financial need? Analysis: Some companies face seasonal or cyclical highs or once-in-a-blue-moon marketing or sales opportunities they must hit or they are doomed. Others enjoy a short term competitive advantage that is significant, so they could make more money expanding rapidly now than growing organically later. In such cases, money invested or loaned now is worth much more than money invested or loaned later. Calculate a bonus value for the timing of money. To Do: Look at a calendar and identify a date before which investment is highly valued and after which it is valued less. Determine what you are willing to give up or pay to get an offer by that date. Question 3: Under what investment terms are you willing to sell 51% of the company, step aside from a management role, or give up a Board seat? Analysis: Many investors have a clear and public preference for roles, such as majority or minority control, a Board seat, their own management team in place. Many investing firms identify this on their websites or will let you know in a timely manner so no one wastes time. It is important to know their preferences. Know what you will accept. Also, smart money is worth more than “dumb” money – that is to say that investors who know the industry, and have sales, merger, or vendor contracts can bring terrific value in addition to needed dollars. So the value of the money to you may vary according to the source. To Do: Think about all the RESOURCES your company needs to grow – not just money. Calculate the time/cost to achieve goals on your own vs. inheriting professional resources (contacts with suppliers, customers, market analysis) with investment dollars. What is that worth to you – what percentage of the company or what management role? Question 4: What upcoming milestones (realistic) will make the company cash flow positive? How much time and money are required to meet the minimums? Analysis: Most private equity sources will not invest all promised funds up front. Rather, they will release a portion to be followed by later tranches if the company meets identified milestones, usually in sales revenue or development. These increments and goals should be negotiated in the contract. To Do: Figure out various fast and cheap tracks to profitability. Calculate the bare bones cost to each and add some pertinent allowance for extra time and costs. Read the term sheet carefully. If accepting less money in a first tranche decreases the likelihood of meeting the milestone, you could lose your company to that investor. Some unsavory characters have written contracts in such a way that they can acquire control of your company for the cost of that first tranche from non-detailed entrepreneurs who were starry eyed about the big number at the end of milestones they were ill equipped to meet. Question 5: If all goes well and the company grows, at what point will expansion exceed the competency of current management? Analysis: Many entrepreneurs are great at starting companies but weaker at maintaining or growing them. The success of the company may depend on recognizing management’s strengths and weaknesses. For example, running a public company is different than running a private one or merging with a competitor. Management of local success may not translate to national or international results. To Do: Develop a graceful transition and departure plan based on realistic self and company-assessment. There is nothing wrong with being the "Founder and Emeritas." CONCLUSION: You will notice that several of these questions approach the same question from different perspectives. The gist is this, “if you cannot achieve your goals without investors or additional capital/skill resources, then the most important valuation to acknowledge is not how much the market will value your company when it is successful, but rather, how much YOU value the EARLY money that takes you the first, steep step to get past the impediments that block you from getting there.


59 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Why Do I Have to Pay Money to Raise Money?

Every week, Bryan receives calls from early stage entrepreneurs. Recently, one bemoaned, “Why do I have to pay money to raise money?” “Well,” asked Bryan, “have you tried to raise money for free?” “S

Comments


bottom of page